Sun, Mar 14th 2010, 10:47am Sign Up Login Forgot Password
Armory Network: Starcraft 2 Armory Diablo 3 Armory
Page 1 - Jump to:
Hydralisk should have 90 hp

Charles1977

Overlord
189 posts

Pet 5,446
3,985

Feb 8th, 08:18am
Should the hydralisk have 90 hp instead of the regular 80 hp to keep up with the shielded marine?

- discuss -

rkddudgns KR

Medivac
1,333 posts

Pet 3,218
2,393

Feb 8th, 08:24am
No. Marines have that upgrade to keep them from being completely obsolete. Hydralisks do not have that problem.

bluestorm355 CA

Marauder
320 posts

Pet 4,291
4,010

Feb 8th, 08:24am
hydras are anti armored. They are most cost effective than marauders, and about the same as hellions.

Dorkmaster52 US

Hellion
786 posts

Pet 27,163
16,519

Feb 8th, 08:32am
What would the purpose be of giving the marine an hp upgrade if your going to give the Hydralisk basically the same thing? No, the hydralisk should not have 90 hp, their cost effective enough the way it is.

Golem72 CA

Zergling
263 posts

2,704
1,800

Feb 8th, 09:10am
Quote by Dorkmaster52
What would the purpose be of giving the marine an hp upgrade if your going to give the Hydralisk basically the same thing? No, the hydralisk should not have 90 hp, their cost effective enough the way it is.


I agree with that statement plus they can be easily massed whenthe economy is good unlike ours right now.

Ps. I need another job!
I WILL PILE BODIES HIGH TO REACH MY KINGDOM!

flubbs

Zergling
283 posts

Pet 10,302
9,286

Feb 8th, 09:24am
I hate to be one of "those" people, but detailed theorycraft such as these really need to wait till beta comes out.

Until people get some trigger time with the game and crunch some numbers, its very difficult to gauge if adding 5 health or 2 damage to units is needed or not.

If the argument was like, "Hydras need to have their bonus damage against biologic- not armored, or their damage bonus needs to be against ugly people- not armored" well then ok. Its fair to speak on broader topics than it is on tiny details which are just moot.

djriki MX

Marauder
314 posts

Pet 4,454
4,243

Feb 8th, 09:25am
Hydarlisk are very powerful how they are right now. If they had more hp, the marine shield is going to be useless against the hydra. So I agree with most of you.

Van Kessel BE

Larva
27 posts

642
550

Feb 8th, 09:27am
Having watched lots of vids of starcraft II, as many of you have too, i firmly believe the hydralisks are just fine the way they are, adding 10hp would make them a bit too tough for a 1st tier(or 2nd??) massable unit.

The_Field_Fox KP

Reaper
385 posts

Pet 4,369
1,670

Feb 8th, 09:36am
I think hyralisks should get the 10 hitpoint upgrade. They should also get miniguns, poison spikes, and underground movement. Hell while were at it give em a second evolution : D
http://www.myspace.com/the_sex_artist

Van Kessel BE

Larva
27 posts

642
550

Feb 8th, 09:46am
Quote by The_Field_Fox
I think hyralisks should get the 10 hitpoint upgrade. They should also get miniguns, poison spikes, and underground movement. Hell while were at it give em a second evolution : D


Hmmm, sounds cool =D ^^

Scepticus CS

SCV
66 posts

Pet 864
751

Feb 8th, 09:47am
No, they don't need that 10 hp because even tho marines have shield upgrade, their healer, Medivac is higher tier unit, than Medic from sc1 was. Without shield upgrade marines would be an easy prey in early game because there's no one to heal them.
You called down the thunder... ...now deal with it.

zerginfestor US

Changeling
757 posts

Pet 1,371
608

Feb 8th, 09:56am
...NO..their good as it is..lings should be more focused on..so obsolete..
Quote by Topace
Have you tried peeing on it?

Deathleech US

Overseer
1,434 posts

Pet 15,067
8,778

Feb 8th, 10:11am
I also gotta go with "no". The Hydralisk has already gotten several buffs from when it was first unveiled for SC2. It use to be 2 supply, cost more minerals and gas, and had a less useful bonus damage modifier, all while having the same attack and health it does now. Since then it's been buffed considerably.

Even compared to it's SC1 version, the current Hydra is slightly better. It's the same cost but it does 10 damage to everything and 4 more bonus to armored while the original did 10 dmg but it was reduced based on unit's sizes. The original also had less range un-upgraded than the base SC2 Hydra does. We all know how useful and massable the Hydra was in SC:BW so I can only imagine how great the buffed SC2 Hydra will be.

Again, a resounding no. Just because Marines got an hp buff doesn't mean Hydra's need one too.

Gemini_19 US

Stalker
444 posts

Pet 10,184
7,839

Feb 8th, 11:29am
Quote by The_Field_Fox
I think hyralisks should get the 10 hitpoint upgrade. They should also get miniguns, poison spikes, and underground movement. Hell while were at it give em a second evolution : D

Sarcasm ftw :D

Dethmunki US

SCV
120 posts

Pet 3,521
2,902

Feb 8th, 11:39am
Just something that I noticed, but according to player preference (on the right hand side of the page right below the username where it says what race you are), the Hamster and OP are the only Zerg that are not outright opossed to this. Mister Van Kessel did indeed agree to The_Field_Fox, but since miniguns are so passe, I decided not to include him.

Also, being a Terran, I am opposed to this, but, being a Terran, my opinion doesn't carry as much weight as, say, a Zerg player, or, say, a cement truck. Comma.

Period.